Consolidated Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Solidified Life - Essay Example Attempting to endeavor the conduct of Jack was not a shrewd activity; Mike would have been better off to attempt to get Jack onside instead of making an adversary out of him. In spite of the fact that his arrangements would have needed to of changed, in any event with Jack as a partner Mike could have made the Supervisors Forum work better. In the event that I was Mike, at that point I would have plunked down for a casual one-on-one gathering with Jack Greely directly at the very begin to manage any issues that may exist between the pair. It is smarter to sift through contrasts before beginning to cooperate, so this could have abstained from smashing later on. It doesn't need to be Mike or Jack; truth be told, it could be a success win circumstance where them two got what they needed. Mike would depict the authoritative culture at Consolidated Life altogether different to how he left it when he briefly moved away. Before there is a joyful methodology present in the work environment condition, yet now with Jack Greely in control there is substantially more structure and association to the firm. Because of Mike laidback character, he thinks that its hard to flourish in a domain that gives off an impression of being so smothering to him. In any case, this is the way that Jack works so there is little point in griping about it. Going to Rick to communicate a few concerns would be an exercise in futility since it appears as though Rick sees something in Jack that he loves. Mike needs to understand that the game has changed and he must be the one to adjust and fit it; not the opposite way around. Each representative has a tremendous obligation to peruse an organizations culture and change in accordance with it. This is something that each representative should hope to concentrate on when they initially enter a work environment. Hierarchical achievement comes straightforwardly from the group culture that is established.â

Use of neologisms in legal translation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Utilization of neologisms in legitimate interpretation - Essay Example This examination will start with the explanation that the troubles in lawful interpretation starting with one unique term then onto the next regarding â€Å"cultural asymmetry† between various legitimate frameworks of which one nation or gathering of nations’ lawful ideas just as court methods have been shaped by their own history and experience. In like manner, these set up lawful ideas are not generally, if by any stretch of the imagination, shared by different nations or countries and conditions of which target language for interpretation might be essential. When explicit perception was that of Stern where there are affirmation and convenience of different societies in the International Criminal Tribunal for previous Yugoslavia (ICTY) yet these â€Å"other cultures† couldn't encounter equivalent status with the Anglo-Saxon legitimate and informative culture overwhelming the Tribunal. While it is commonly comprehended that legitimate language is acknowledged by the exactness of its lawful terms dominatingly nonexclusive and obvious with the goal that they are not decoded by a straightforward procedure of balanced relationship in phonetics, Newmark and Baker likewise brought up that the overall precision of lawful or lexical equal was hazardous in the interpretation and translation process. Nearby courts may utilize the basic abilities of legitimate experts and the legal executive, yet there are developing events and occurrences that outside just as globally acknowledged laws are a need so as to give lawful answers for neighborhood cases, and the other way around. The nature of understanding, at that point, just as the exigency of equity gets reliant on the translator, or how lawful interpretation is experienced, introduced and utilized. This paper will attempt to investigate the utilization of neologism in lawful interpretation with close reference to Rene de Groot's article Title and (year, PLEASE SUPPLY, ALSO UNDER REFERENCE) just as to other accessible assets. Conversation: Though Swiss etymologist Ferdinand de Saussure contended that Language is an arrangement of associated terms wherein the estimation of each term results exclusively from the concurrent nearness of the others ... Content is truly fixed uniquely by the simultaneousness of everything that exists outside it. Being a piece of a framework, it is blessed with a connotation as well as and particularly with a worth, (qtd. Noth, 1990, p 61), we are then given specialized association of words between and among themselves which out and out changes when utilized with different words. This by itself just as social contrasts give a trouble in the way of deciphering lawful terms which this paper investigates. As of now, in an investigation directed by Stern (2004), it was recognized that the absence of careful lawful reciprocals between dialects, in this setting English and French or Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian (BCS), was an obstruction and a troublesome part of interpretation. Given models for ordinary terms and ideas, for example, charges, questioning, pre-preliminary, to concede/not liable, past any sensible uncertainty or equalization of likelihood (and) cognates, for example, offer, charges, complaint, (Stern, 2004) demonstrated to have distinctive hugeness in the objective language/s and introduced disparities in the interpretation of legitimate authoritative records, just as decisions. Weston (1983 p 207), himself called attention to that, It is no business of the interpreter's to make another word or articulation if the SL [source language] articulation can be sufficiently and helpfully deciphered by utilizing one of the prior strategies of which techniques were counted as: 1. proportionate ideas 2. strict interpretations 3. leaving the term un-interpreted. De Groot, by and by, introduced three arrangements as: 1. Try not to interpret and utilize the objective language the first or deciphered term from the source language. On the off chance that vital one clarifies the idea between sections or in a commentary by utilizing a 'strict interpretation' or by utilizing a comment as 'equivalent with

Computer Education Technology Free Essays

Back to the 1940s, the advanced electronic PC was created at U.S. colleges; be that as it may, in the year, there was no PC instruction yet. We will compose a custom article test on PC Education Technology or on the other hand any comparable theme just for you Request Now It required increasingly 10 years to have PC instruction. The time of the PC upset was 1950 in the U.S.. PC instruction started in the 1950s with a sorted out collection of information. Likewise Japanese the instructing of software engineering has been created in a similar period. During 1955 to 1959, a few colleges built up their own PCs. They composed short courses. PC innovation originates from the U.S. to Japan. Normally an innovation is created in the U.S.. From that point forward, it comes to Japan so Japanese PC instruction is late at all and most manuals are written in English so it is anything but difficult to lean PC for individuals who communicate in English; nonetheless, most Japanese individuals who live in Japan can't get English so they need to make an interpretation of English to Japanese to comprehend the manuals. It needs a lot of time. Generally Japanese colleges instruct PC to understudies in Japanese so understudies need to consider PC as well as English when they attempt to utilize PC regardless of whether they can utilize Japanese working framework. For instance, the order of the PC programming dialects are written in English so Japanese understudies must have word reference their hand, subsequently, a few understudies quit learning it. It is so difficult for Japanese understudy. Sooner rather than later, PC innovation will be required and significant for not just understudies who need to be developers or designers yet in addition general Japanese individuals so Japanese PC training needs to locate their own PC instructive framework with the goal that individuals who have no PC information can learn it without any problem. Step by step instructions to refer to Computer Education Technology, Papers

System T5 Risk - Free Essay Example

Dissertation Objectives Investigate the problems at the terminal 5 opening, especially with the baggage handling system despite extensive simulated testing using thousands of bags and more than two thousand volunteers in the run up to the opening of T5 Identify the necessary risk strategies to be considered for such mega-projects, the benefits of such approaches, taking into account previous failed and successful projects, and any lessons to be learnt Discuss the implementation approach adopted by BAA and the risk associated with this approach Provide formative evaluation summarising key findings and conclusion based on evidence gathered from research T5 Synopsis The terminal 5 project in addition to being a statement of intent for the future of British aviation was built with the aim of improving customer experience and to exhibit Heathrow as a world class international airport. The baggage handling system at T5 was designed to be the largest baggage handling system in Europe for a single terminal. The system consists of a main baggage sorter and a fast track system. The system was designed by an integrated team from BAA, BA and Vanderlande Industries of the Netherlands, with the aim of handling both intra-terminal and inter-terminal luggage. Its processing capacity was intended to be 70,000 bags a day. Bags are meant to undergo several processes on the way through the system, these include; automatic identification, explosives screening, fast tracking for urgent bags, sorting and automatic sorting and passenger reconciliation. The scheduled completion and opening date was March 2008, and T5 was on time and on budget. This was a remarkable achievement especially in a sector where project delays and vast overspends are commonplace (the Millennium dome, Wembley stadium and the Scottish Parliament buildings were all opened late and cost a lot more than the original estimate). However, on its first day in operation, T5s bespoke baggage system was affected by technical software problems, which led to a number of issues, such as cancelled flights, lost baggage, and substantial delays, but more importantly, BAs challenge were its people issues and integrating teams of staff. Initial reports suggest that the day one issues were less to do with technology issues and more to do with inadequate staff training, and this was not just for one group of people but at all levels. Below is a summary of its problems on the opening day: Hundreds of staff found it difficult finding the staff car park entrance Check-in staff struggled with their systems, these problems ranged from very simple tasks such as logging into the baggage system to complex tasks Security personnel who were totally ignorant of their new roles and had to be taken through new procedures in the morning in front of passengers Ground staff and crews and ground staff getting lost in the huge building Baggage handlers struggled to get a hang of the new baggage system Baggage truck drivers got lost within the terminal and needed directions to the aircraft Baggage drivers and handlers could not get luggage from the conveyors to the gates On nine occasions, inspectors from the department of transport had managed to bypass security checks during trials of the terminals new systems and that the terminals alarm system was not working properly Going through these problems therefore suggest that the entire problem was down to lack of adequate training or simply inappropriate appraisal of risk involved. This is very surprising as this was a very high profile project and taking into account that this was a simple 3 team process get baggage, take baggage to aircraft and load baggage onto aircraft. Training System Testing Prior to Opening Based on initial interviews with BAs CIO, it would suggest that the human elements were given the importance it required. BAs CIO, Paul Coby told CIO UK [in March 2007] the IT work to support such a large-scale, new-build project was also going well. Devices are deployed, connections are being integrated and 2007 will be testing year. The airline is moving onto the T5 systems, so they run for a year ready to operate at the new terminal when it opens in 2008. According to XXXXX, in the run up to the opening of T5 there were a series of overnight baggage-systems tests using thousands of bags, up to 2000 volunteers and full trials of the check-in procedure for all the IT systems. According to the spokesman for Vanderlande Industries, in testing the baggage handling system, emulation models were utilized broadly to test the low-level controls software, while computer programs took the place of the baggage handling system, and which behave (almost) the same as the part they replace. The report also suggests that for the high-level controls software, the emulation model was broadened by connecting the loose individual models into a large integrated system in which the physical equipment was replaced by a number of interconnected emulation models. According to a number of the volunteers who tested the system prior to its opening commented that the demos were extremely impressive and felt the system was ready in advance of its opening. T5 System Simulation Prior to Opening According to the spokesman for Vanderlande Industries, low-level emulation models were utilized in place of the physical transport equipment in each of the conveyor lines. The low and high level models that were developed produced the same electrical outputs in response to the same electrical inputs as their corresponding physical equivalent (motors, photo-electric cells, barcode scanners, etc), which in the view of both the software developers and management of BA, proof of extensive system testing. System interaction was facilitated with the use of control panels, and with the right frequency, set of bags or multiple bags were generated. During the testing, the conveyor motors were stopped and started utilizing different scenarios in order to generate as much errors as possible with the hope of fixing them. The spokesman also stated that the transport time between two photocells in emulation was equal to the actual time using the real equipment. The same measurement also applied to the total transport time. In addition, during testing the T5 project, over 90 individual low-level emulation models were created as individual models were integrated into 5 different configurations. A separate team spent 4800 hours on building and testing these emulation models. Questions: Training Testing But the first set of questions now has to be asked: how adequate was the tests and training were carried out in relation to T5s baggage systems in advance of the opening? What were the results? What were the problems revealed? and what steps were taken to resolve the problems revealed? Were the tests re-run and, if so, what was the result? Was the right implementation strategy adopted? Or would it not have been better to open Terminal 5 on a phased basis, to make sure that all its systems were working before going fully operational? The second set of questions to be asked would be: knowing that extensive simulation testing was carried out on the baggage system successfully; doesnt that then suggest that carrying out simulated testing without the real customers is inadequate? With regards to the people issues, what sort of dry runs were carried out? If they were indeed adequate, why were the opening day hiccups not identified? Where there extra staff or volunteers in anticipation of potential glitches? If yes were these trained adequately? For every eventuality or possible scenario, what were the contingency plans? In spite of the extensive testing carried out on the baggage system and the confidence which this would have placed on top management, from the experience on the opening day, we can conclude that in reality, the prospects of operating an airport terminal of such magnitude and scale would require more than simulated testing as the operations are virtually impossible to fully replicate. This then suggests that the risk management utilized by the BA was not robust to take the people issues into account. Good risk management might have come to the conclusion, if there was the possibility of failure. Risk Management: Definitions In order to manage risks we have to understand what a risk is. Smith and Merrit (2002) said that three essential aspects of risk are uncertainty, loss and time, see Figure 1. Uncertainty: A project manager has to identify as many uncertainties as possible. A risk may or may not happen. This inherent uncertainty cannot be eliminated, but it can be made little clearer by clarifying the probability of occurrence of the risk, to get at better understanding of the consequences and alternatives if the risk occurs and determine the factors that influence the magnitude and likelihood of occurrence of the particular risk. This means that an uncertainty can never be completely eliminated, but it can be reduced to a level the project find tolerable. This means that even with the best plans there cannot be any guarantees that there will be no surprises [3]. Loss: A risk is always something that involves some kind of loss. If there is no loss possible, then the project is not concerned about the risk, because it cannot compromise the project [3]. Time: Associated with every risk there is a time where the risk no longer exists. Either the risk has occurred and the loss has been suffered or the potential problems that could cause the risk have been resolved and no longer pose a threat. It is important to know when this time has arrived so the risk can be removed from the agenda [3]. Among writers and in the literature there are differences in the meaning of risk management and risk analysis. Frosdick (1997) says that there are no clear views of the differences and what one writer defines as risk management another writer is calling it risk analysis. Frosdicks own view is that he separates them by saying that risk analysis is the sum of the processes of risk identification, estimation and evaluation and risk management is about planning, monitoring and controlling activities that are produced by the risk analysis activity. The Association for Project Management (Chapman, Simister 2004) definition of risk analysis is similar to Frosdicks, they have however divided the risk analysis into two stages. The first stage is called the Qualitative Analysis and it is where risks are identified and subjectively assessed. These identified risks are then analysed in terms of e.g. cost and time estimates and that is called the Quantitative Analysis. Just like for Frosdick it is then followed by the risk management process. In their definition it is the process of formulating responses, both proactive and reactive ones. Pennock Haimes (2001) said that risk management could be represented in six steps, three each for risk assessment/analysis and risk management, where each step is a question. Risk assessment/analysis What can go wrong? Identify as many risks as possible. The risks can be of any kind financial, time, resources etc. and no risk is too small to not be included [3]. What is the likelihood for the risk to occur? Try to measure how likely, or unlikely, it is for the risk to occur. Maybe some risks are dependent on each other [3]. What are the consequences? What will be the impact on the project if the risk occurs, is it a minor risk or maybe a stopping fault that endangers the whole project [3]. Risk management What can be done and what options are available? How to decrease the chance of a risk occurring, for example get more resources or have them readily available [2,3]. What are the tradeoffs in term of all costs, benefits and risks among the available options? For every risk there is somewhere a limit for how costly measures one can put in, where there is no economy in putting in more measures. Often the budget is not enough to eliminate all risks therefore one must choose which risks to put more emphasis on [2,3]. What are the impacts on current decisions on future options? [3] The official definition provided by Professor James Garven, University of Texas at Austin is from the American Risk and Insurance Association: Risk management is the systematic process of managing an organizations risk exposures to achieve its objectives in a manner consistent with public interest, human safety, environmental factors, and the law. It consists of the planning, organizing, leading, coordinating, and controlling activities undertaken with the intent of providing an efficient pre-loss plan that minimizes the adverse impact of risk on the organizations resources, earnings, and cash flows. Another definition given by Larry Krantz, Chief Executive of Euro Log Ltd in the UK, states that A risk is a combination of constraint and uncertainty. We all face constraints in our projects, and also uncertainty. So we can minimise the risk in the project either by eliminating constraints (a nice conceit) or by finding and reducing uncertainty []. The objectives of risk management/analysis The Association for Project Management (Chapman, Simister 2004) defines Risk Management/Analysis as a process designed to remove or reduce the risks that threaten the achievement of project objectives. Properly undertaken it will increase the likelihood of successful completion of a project in terms of cost, time and performance objectives. PMBOK (PMBOK Guide, 2004) describes it similarly where they say that the objectives of project management are to increase the probability and impact of positive effects and decrease the probability and impact of events adverse to project objectives. Kendrick (2003) list seven benefits on the use of risk management: Project Justification: Project risk management is undertaken primarily to improve the chances that a project will achieve its objectives. While there are never any guarantees, broader awareness of common failure modes and ideas that make projects more robust can significantly improve the odds of success. The primary goal of project risk management is either to develop a credible foundation for each project, showing that it is possible, or to demonstrate that the project is not feasible so that it can be avoided, aborted, or transformed [1]. Lower Costs and Less Chaos: Adequate risk analysis reduces both the overall cost and the frustration caused by avoidable problems [4]. The amount of rework and of unforeseen late project effort is minimised. Knowledge of the root causes of the potentially severe project problems enables project leaders and teams to work in ways that avoid these problems. Dealing with the causes of risk also minimises fire-fighting and chaos during projects, much of which is focused short-term and deals primarily with symptoms rather than the intrinsic sources of the problems [1]. Chadbourn (1999) describes it similarly when he likened the uncertainties to chaos, where a poorly designed project could be described as a room full of mousetraps, each with a ping pong ball [5]. Before you know it, someone not under your control tosses in the first ball, thus mayhem and chaos erupts [5]. In the ideal project the mousetraps are gone. In their place there is a network of dominos, where each action and reacti on could be foreseen [5]. It is within the role of organisations to try and identify these mousetraps and replace them with an orderly string of dominos [5]. Project Priority and Management Support: Support from managers and other project stakeholders and commitment from the project team are more easily won when projects are based on thorough, understandable information [11]. High-risk projects may begin with lower priority, but a thorough risk plan, displaying competence and good preparation for possible problems, can improve the project priority [11]. Whenever you are successful in raising the priority of your project, you significantly reduce project riskby opening doors, reducing obstacles, making resources available, and shortening queues for services [11]. Project Portfolio Management: Achieving and maintaining an appropriate mix of ongoing projects for an organisation uses risk data as a key factor. The ideal project portfolio includes both lower- and higher-risk projects in proportions that are consistent with the business objectives [13]. Fine-Tuning Plans to Reduce Risk: Risk analysis uncovers weaknesses in a project plan and triggers changes, new activities, and resource shifts that improve the project. Risk analysis at the project level may also reveal needed shifts in overall project structure or basic assumptions [14]. Establishing Management Reserve: Risk analysis demonstrates the uncertainty of project outcomes and is useful in setting reserves for schedule and/or resources. Risky projects really require a window of time (or budget), instead of a single-point objective. While the project targets can be based on expectations (the most likely versions of the analysis), project commitments should be established with less aggressive goals, reflecting overall project risk. The target and committed objectives set a range for acceptable project results and provide visible recognition of project risk [18]. Project Communication and Control: Project communication is more effective when there is a solid, credible plan. Risk assessments also build awareness of project exposures for the project team, showing how painful the problems might be and when and where they might occur. This causes people to work in ways that avoid project difficulties. Risk data can also be very useful in negotiations with project sponsors. Using information about the likelihood and consequences of potential problems gives project teams more influence in defining objectives, determining budgets, obtaining staff, setting deadlines, and negotiating project changes [18]. Risk Assessment Risk Control There are two stages in the process of Project Risk Management, Risk Assessment and Risk Control. Risk Assessment can take place at any time during the project, though the sooner the better. However, Risk Control cannot be effective without a previous Risk Assessment. Similarly, most people tend to think that having performed a Risk Assessment, they have done all that is needed. Far too many projects spend a great deal of effort on Risk Assessment and then ignore Risk control completely [19]. Risk Assessment has three elements: Identify Uncertainties In this element, the entire project plans are explored, with special focus on areas of uncertainty [20]. Analyse Risks In this element, the requirement is to specify how the areas of uncertainty will have an impact on the performance of the project, either in duration, cost or meeting the users requirements [20]. Prioritise Risks At this stage the requirement is to establish which of the Risks identified should be eliminated completely [20]. This step is only is carried out due to the potential extreme impact, which should have regular management attention, and which are sufficiently minor to avoid detailed management attention [20]. In the same way, Risk Control has three elements, as follows: Mitigate Risks According to Mobey et al (2002), risk mitigation would include taking the necessary actions that are possible in advance to reduce the effect of Risk. It is better to spend money on mitigation than to include contingency in the plan [20]. Plan for Emergencies For all those Risks which are deemed to be significant, have an emergency plan in place before it happens [19]. Measure and Control This involves tracking the effects of the risks identified and managing them to a successful conclusion [19]. Different strategies There are different strategies and methods that have different approaches toward risk management. JISC (Joint Information Systems Management) says that the focus for risk management should be on risks related to the particular project, not project management in general (https://www.jisc.ac.uk/proj_manguide15.html). The overall goal according to Kendrick (2003) for risk management in a single project is to establish a credible plan consistent with business objectives and then to minimise the range of possible outcomes. That is why risk management in a project is about identifying potential risks, analyse the ones that have the greatest likelihood of occurring, grade their different levels of impact on the project and define a plan of how to avoid the risk and if it occurs how to reduce its impact (Heldman, 2005). Smith Merrit (2001) sees risk strategy as a five step process. Figure 3 shows the flow through the five-step process and lists deliverables from each step: Step 1: Identify risks that you could encounter across all facets of the project [28]. Step 2: Analyse these risks to determine what is driving them, how great their impact might be, and how likely they are [28]. Step 3: Prioritise and map the risks so that you can choose those most important to resolve [28]. Step 4: Plan how you will take action against the risks on this short list [28]. Step 5: On a regular basis, monitor progress on your action plans, terminate action plans for risks that have been adequately resolved, and look for new risks [28]. Frosdick (1997) also mentioned Strutts, definition of the concept of risk analysis that is a seven stage process. Systematic assessment (item by item question every part of the system) [13]. Identification of risks [13]. Assessment of risks (frequencies and consequences) [13]. Establish acceptable/tolerable levels of risk [13]. Evaluate the risks. Are they acceptable? Can they be reduced and at what cost? Determine whether the risks are as low as reasonably practicable [13]. Determine risk reduction measures where appropriate [13]. Risk Assessment Evaluation There are many ways and different techniques to evaluate what the risks are, what the effect they have on the project and what measures can be put in if the risks should occur [19]. Risk assessment is by most people divided into two areas, Quantitative Risk Analysis and Qualitative Risk Analysis. Quantitative In its most basic form the formula for risk quantification is: Rate of occurrence multiplied by the impact of the event = risk. Methods based on this method are often called expected value analysis and include models like Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALM), the Courtney formula, the Livermore Risk Analysis Methodology (LRAM) and Stochastic Dominance (Snyder, Rainer Jr., Carr 1991). The advantages of Quantitative Risk Analysis methodologies are that they are good at identifying the most critical areas that, if something happens, will have the largest impact on the project. There are also disadvantages to Quantitative Risk Analysis. When one measures the probability of damage to the project the quantitative approach tends to average the events leading up to a problem (Snyder, Rainer Jr, Carr 1991). Qualitative Qualitative methods attempts to express risks in terms of descriptive variables rather than an economic impact. These approaches are based on the assumption that certain threat or loss of data cannot be appropriately expressed in terms of dollars or pounds and that precise information is impossible to obtain. These methodologies include Scenario Analysis/Planning, Fuzzy Metrics and questionnaires (Snyder, Rainer Jr., Carr 1991). The advantages of Qualitative Risk Analysis methodologies are that they save time, effort and expense over quantitative methods. This is because assets do not need exact values in dollars or pounds nor do threats need to have exact probabilities. It is also a valuable methodology in identifying significant weaknesses in a risk management portfolio. There are disadvantages with this method as well. Qualitative Risk Analysis is inexact, the variables used (e.g. low, medium and high) must be understood by all parties involved (Snyder, Rainer Jr., Carr 1991). Risks Reduction Once risks have been identified and evaluated they have to be responded to in some way. Wideman (1992) lists seven basic responses on identified risks: Recognised but no action taken (absorbed as a matter of policy) Avoided (by taking appropriate steps) Reduced (by an alternative approach) Shared (with others, e.g., by joint venture) Transferred (to others through contract or insurance) Retained and absorbed (by prudent allowances) Handled by a combination of the above Dorfman (1997) says that all techniques to manage the risk fall into one or more of these four major categories (remembered as the 4 Ts): Tolerate (aka Retention) Treat (aka Mitigation) Terminate (aka Elimination) Transfer (aka Buying Insurance) Bliss (2005) listed these five types of similar risk responses as Dorfman and Wideman. Risk avoidance: Also known as risk removal or risk prevention, risk avoidance involves altering the original plans for the project so that particularly risky elements are removed. It could include deciding not to perform an activity that carries a high risk. Adopting such avoidance techniques may seem an obvious way to deal with all risks. However, often the areas of the project that involve high risks are also the areas of the project that potentially contain the highest worth or the best value for money. Avoiding such risks may also result in removing potentially the best bits of a resource, and an alternative strategy that retains these risks may be more appropriate [13]. Risk reduction: Risk reduction or risk mitigation involves the employment of methods that reduce the probability of a risk occurring, or reducing the severity of the impact of a risk on the outcome of the project. The loss of highly skilled staff is a considerable risk in any project and not one that can be totally avoided. Suitable risk mitigation could involve the enforcement of a notice period, comprehensive documentation allowing for replacement staff to continue with the job at hand and adequate management oversight and the use of staff development programmes to encourage staff to stay [20]. Risk transfer: Risk transfer moves the ownership of the risk to a third party normally by contract. This also moves the impact of the risk away from the project itself to this third party [20]. Risk deferral: The impact a risk can have on a project is not constant throughout the life of a project. Risk deferral entails deferring aspects of the project to a date when a risk is less likely to happen. For example managing the expectations users have about the content and delivery of a resource can be time-consuming, one way to reduce this risk is by not making a web resource available until user testing is complete [20]. Risk retention: Whilst a certain number of the risks to the project originally identified can be removed by changing the project plan or dealt with by transferring the responsibility of the risk to third parties inevitably certain risks have to be accepted as a necessary part of the project. All risks that have not been avoided or transferred are retained or accepted risks by default [20]. Previous Successful Project: St Pancras International Rail Station According to XXXXXX, before St Pancras International rail station was opened; a number of days were devoted to testing all the systems and processes, using an army of thousands of volunteer passengers. These tests were carried out much before the opening day, thus providing enough time to resolve issues that might have occurred during testing [26]. By carrying out the testing in phases much long before the opening, members of staff were able to familiarize themselves with the systems and get actual hands-on experience before the station was opened to Eurostar traffic. Dry-runs were carried out as well with the vital lessons were learnt and adjustments made before exposing paying customers to the St Pancras experience. Inevitably the result was that on the opening day, everything went without glitches on the first day of international service [26]. Previous Failed Project: Denver International Airport The Denver International Airport was scheduled to open on October 31, 1993 with all three of its concourses fully running on the BAE automated baggage handling system that. On February 28, 1995, the new airport finally opened. Its opening came sixteen months late. The automated baggage system was supposed to improve baggage handling by using a computer tracking system to direct baggage contained in unmanned carts that run on a track. BAE systems presented the City of Denver with a proposal to develop the most complex and automated [and integrated] baggage system ever built. Original target opening date for the airport was (delayed seven times over the next three months). City of Denver invited reporters to observe the first test of the baggage system without notifying BAE. This was a public disaster! Reporters saw piles of disgorged clothes and other personal items lying beneath the Telecars tracks. Lots of mechanical and software problems plagued the automated baggage handling system. When the system was tested, bags were misloaded, sent to different routes, and fell out of automated telecarts, thus causing the system to jam. The automated baggage system still continued to unload bags even though they were jammed on the conveyor belt, because the photo eye at this location could not detect the pile of bags on the belt and hence could not signal the system to stop. Main Lessons One of the lessons BA and BAA might have been learnt from the Denver project, was that BAE actually built a prototype of the automated baggage handling system in a 50,000 sq. ft. warehouse near its manufacturing plant in Texas. But as similar to the T5 project, there was no evidence of adequate training and the results from simulation testing has been proven to be different to a real world scenario with real customers. I addition, research also shows that BAE had given an initial estimate of at least a year to test the system and get the system up and running, but United airlines and the other stakeholders pressed for a much shorter timeframe. City of Denver got the same story from technical advisers to the Franz Joseph Strauss airport in Munich (that less complicated system had taken 2 years testing and was running 24 hours a day for 6 months before the airport opened. Risks recognised early in the Project Very large scale of the project. Enormous complexity. Newness of the technology. Large number of entities to be served by the system. The high degree of technical and project definition uncertainty. Risk Identification PMBOK (PMBOK Guide, 2004) lists five tools and techniques for risk identification: documentation reviews, information gathering techniques, checklist analysis, assumption analysis and diagramming techniques. Risk identification and analysis is a specialist business, but generally it cant be done without first consulting key personnel, typically through interviews, questionnaires and workshops. Risk workshops are particularly effective in bringing together all those to be affected by the initiative, thus ensuring that everyone gets a chance to present their case, hear different points of view, raise and discuss ideas, and be more circumspect and candid [1]. Documentation Reviews: A structured review may be performed of project documentation, including plans, assumptions, prior project files, and other information. The quality of the plans, as well as consistency between those plans and with the project requirements and assumptions, can be indicators of risk in the project [1]. Information Gathering Techniques: Examples of information gathering techniques used in identifying risk can include: Brainstorming: The goal of brainstorming is to obtain a comprehensive list of project risks. The project team usually performs brainstorming, often with a multidisciplinary set of experts not on the team. Ideas about project risk are generated under the leadership of a facilitator [1] Delphi technique: The Delphi technique is a way to reach a consensus of experts. Project risk experts participate in this technique anonymously. A facilitator uses a questionnaire to solicit ideas about the important project risks. The responses are summarised and are then re-circulated to the experts for further comment. Consensus may be reached in a few rounds of this process. The Delphi technique helps reduce bias in the data and keeps any one person from having undue influence on the outcome [1]. Interviewing: Interviewing experienced project participants, stakeholders, and subject matter experts can identify risks. Interviews are one of the main sources of risk identification data gathering [1]. Root cause identification: This is an inquiry into the essential causes of a projects risks. It sharpens the definition of the risk and allows grouping risks by causes. Effective risk responses can be developed if the root cause of the risk is addressed [1]. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis: This technique ensures examination of the project from each of the SWOT perspectives, to increase the breadth of considered risks [1]. Checklist Analysis: Risk identification checklists can be developed based on historical information and knowledge that has been accumulated from previous similar projects and from other sources of information. The lowest level of the RBS can also be used as a risk checklist. While a checklist can be quick and simple, it is impossible to build an exhaustive one. Care should be taken to explore items that do not appear on the checklist. The checklist should be reviewed during project closure to improve it for use on future projects [1]. Assumptions Analysis: Every project is conceived and developed based on a set of hypotheses, scenarios, or assumptions. Assumptions analysis is a tool that explores the validity of assumptions as they apply to the project. It identifies risks to the project from inaccuracy, inconsistency, or incompleteness of assumptions [1]. Risk Management Perspectives The first is precedent how were risks handled before in similar circumstances? Much has been documented in this area in the form of case studies and anecdotes. Second, the current position needs to be fully considered: what are the specific, known and speculative risks relating to all the relevant factors? The workshop provides a good starting point to uncover evident and less apparent issues. But a third and complementary approach is also important brainstorming or envisaging the totally unexpected, perhaps incredible, but nevertheless possible scenarios [1]. Lessons fro T5 Project Training: People are the most important part of any project According to XXXXXX, some middle managers and staff representatives within BA had warned of the apparent lack of training weeks before the opening of T5. As I stated previously system simulation testing was carried out initially with a few members of staff, but it was reported that subsequent tests which would have included all members staff in the baggage section was called off. It beats my imagination why this was not spotted as a potential risk. It would therefore seem that although training was carried out, but it was the wrong type of training, not sufficient, not with all members of staff, and it was not taken as part of a coherent management plan, the right sort of training would have made some difference. T5 Risk Assessment: Reliance on System vs Processes According to Kerzner (2003), for high profile projects, it is imperative to focus on testing the entire business processes and the systems as well rather than focus on system testing only. This concept comes from the tried and tested model office testing concept, whereby every detail in each process is tested as a separate entity. If such was applied to the T5 project, even processes such as members of staff finding their way to the car park would have been included. T5 Risk Assessment: Scale Volume From the newspaper editorials, it can be observed that management misjudged in assuming that staff would simply pick up on the demands of terminal 5, without realising the expected volume and demands of the new terminal which was in sharp contrast to what they were used to in terminals 1-4. According to Chapman et al (2004), with the introduction of new systems or approach to working in an environment, there is usually a drop in performance, which can be attributed to glitches in getting used to the new system or way of carrying out work. Contingency and failure of Risk Assessment From the editorials analysed, it would seem that with the training that was carried out on the T5 baggage system, BA management did not act on the findings or results of the test carried out. This can only be described as blatant disregard or misunderstanding on the management of risk or gross incompetence. According to Saff et al (2004), most software systems fail due to inadequate testing of system in its entirety, as most organizations or software developers are more interested in testing the system to scale through the process, rather than testing to reveal bugs and inaccuracies which is the fundamental purpose of testing in the first place [34]. Integrating Project Control Methods According to Eason (1988), one of the areas that most organizations overlook when introducing a new system is change overload. This is a major risk factor as implementing so much changes too quickly without the adequate resources to deal with such a change is courting trouble as the collapse would be inevitable [12]. First of all organizations will need to take into account the type of change to be effected and the corresponding management system / resources to handle the new systems and address any impending risk which might arise [12]. Implementation Strategy From the editorials analysed suggests that the Big Bang implementation method was utilized in the T5 project. According to Nah et al (2003), this is one of the most difficult kinds of implementation, as existing system is being discontinued in its entirety as the end of one day and a new system replaces it on the following day. A highly publicised example in recent years was the overnight switch of the London Stock Market to electronic trading in 1986. Limitations of this Approach Complex System Integration Although in principle, this might have appealed as a very quick process in switching over to terminal 5, however, in practice it is a method that is fraught with so much risk as the implementation of over 21,000 PCs, and a very complex baggage system is very risky due to the need for incorporating training and system integration which would take most members of staff a long while to master. Human Resource Limitations Implementing a big-bang approach would require lots of expert resources who would need very detailed training over a long period of time before the opening. Whilst this should have been a risk factor that BA should have incorporated regardless of the implementation approach, however, studies from previous projects have shown that this is difficult and is best utilized in a phased implementation approach. Alternative Approaches Parallel Computing One popular way of minimising the risks to the on-going, work is to introduce the new system alongside the old one and to run them in parallel until everybody is confident that the new system will be effective [24]. Phased Introduction The problems of making massive changes can be eased by phasing in the changes over a period. There are two ways in which large-scale changes can be subdivided to facilitate phased introduction. First, the functionality of the technical system can be introduced in phases so that the basic task processes can be supported in the early stages and subsequently facilities can be added which support, for example, decision-making tasks. Second, it may be possible to introduce the system in different parts of the organisation at different times. A combination of these two approaches can also be used [24]. Trial and Dissemination This strategy explicitly recognises that will be teething troubles when a new system is introduced. By holding an essential trial or pilot project before embarking upon full-scale implementation. This strategy provides a valuable opportunity to prepare thoroughly for implementation before it is in the throes of full-scale change. However, many organisations fail to make good use of the opportunities that the trial presents [24]. Incremental Implementation The alternative to a revolutionary change is gradual evolution. The growing sophistication and flexibility of technology is making the incremental implementation of system and increasingly practical proposition. When users are discretionary and powerful and their needs are varied, not to say idiosyncratic, the service has to be tailored to individuals and incremental implementation may be the only option that is acceptable to users [24]. Bibliography [1] A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, (2004). Project Management Institute, 3rd edition (PMBOK Guide). Auguston, K. (1994), The Denver Airport: A lesson in coping with complexity, Modern Materials Handling, Oct., pp. 40 45. [2] Brandon D. (2006), Project Management for Modern Information Systems, IGI Publishing [3] Brady, Tim, Davies, Andrew, Gann, David and Rush, Howard (2006). Learning from Landmark Projects: a Study of Heathrow Terminal 5. In IRNOP VII Project Research Conference, 11-13 Oct 2006, Xian, China. Breier Neidle Patrone Associates (1990) DIA Denver International Airport, Baggage Handling Systems, Conceptual Design Study Final Report, BNP Doc. Ref. 9016R.008,19 Oct. [4] Carr H., Rainer Jr. R.K. Snyder C. (1991), Risk analysis for information, Journal of Management Information Systems, 8 (1), pp. 129-147 [5] Chapman C. Simister S. (2004). The PRAM process Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide, 2nd Edition. APM Publishing Ltd. [6] Company History (2001) Waterfront the journey so far. [Video VHS] Waterfront Consultants Media Archives. [7] DfT (2004), Channel Tunnel Rail Link London Underground Ltd Works Kings Cross: Review of Phase 2, Department for Transport, London. [8] Dinsmore P. Cabanis-Brewin J. (2006), The AMA Handbook of Project Management, Second Edition, AMACOM [9] Doernemann H. (2002),Tool-Based Risk Management Made Practical, Joint IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE02), p. 192 [10] Donaldson A.J.M., (2002). Narrative Case Study of the Denver Airport Baggage Handling System, SFC TR 2002-01, https://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/SFC/Reports/TR2002-01.pdf [11] Dorfmann Mark S. (1997), Introduction to Risk Management and Insurance (6th ed.), Prentice Hall [12] Eason, K. D. (1988). Information technology and organisational change. London: Taylor and Francis [13] Frosdick S. (1997) The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves, Disaster Prevention and Management, 6 (3), pp. 165-177 [14] Guru Dutta, G Srikanth (2004). Operating Strategies Case Studies, BAAs T5: Novel Project Management BAA Plc. An Icfai Business School Case Development Centre publication [15] Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M., Lawerence, P.J. and Filippidis, L. (1999), A Review of the Methodologies Used in the Computer Simulation of Evacuation from the Built Environment, Building and Environment, 34: 741-749. [16] Heldman K. (2005) Project Managers Spotlight on Risk Management, Sybex [17] Implementation Insight (2005) Project Profile. [Video VHS] Waterfront Consultants Media Archives. [18] Kendrick T. (2003) Identifying and Managing Project Risk: Essential Tools for Failure-Proofing Your Project. AMACOM [19] Kerzner H. (2003) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, Eighth Edition, John Wiley Sons [20] Westland J. (2006), The Project Management Life Cycle: Complete Step-by-Step Methodology for Initiating, Planning, Executing Closing a Project Successfully, Kogan Page [21] Lewis P. Wong L. (2005), Accelerated Project Management: How to Be the First to Market, Wong McGraw-Hill [22] Mahoney, J (2000): Identify misaligned roles that cause project failure, Gartner, TechRepublic. Project Management 1 Readings, Australian Computer Society [23] Mobey A. Parker D. (2002) Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation, Work Study, 51(4), pp. 202 208 [24] Nah, F. F. and Lau, J. L. (2003). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management, 7(3), 285-296. [25] Nakanishi, Y., Kim, K., Ulusoy, Y. and Bata, A. (2003), Assessing Emergency Preparedness of Transit Agencies: A Focus on Performance Indicators, Annual Transportation Research Board, USA [26] RSSB (2003), Managing Large Events and Perturbations at Stations: Passenger Flow Modeling Technical Review, Railway Safety Standards Board, London. [27] Schuyler J. (2001), Risk and Decision Analysis in Projects, Second Edition, Project Management Institute [28] Smith P Merrit G. (2002) Proactive Risk Management, Productivity press [29] Taylor J. (2004), Managing Information Technology Projects: Applying Project Management Strategies to Software, Hardware, and Integration Initiatives, AMACOM [30] Yin R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Third edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage publication. [31] Whitten N. (2005), Neal Whittens No-Nonsense Advice for Successful Projects, Whitten Management Concepts [32] Wideman R. M. (1992.) Risk Management, A guide to Managing Project Risks Opportunities, Project Management Institute [33] Whitten N. (2005), Neal Whittens No-Nonsense Advice for Successful Projects, Whitten Management Concepts [34] Saff. D and Ernst. M.D., (2004). An Experimental Evaluation of Continuous Testing During Development. In ISSTA 04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 76-85, Boston, MA, USA. Newspaper Editorials What did go wrong at Terminal 5? BBC https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7318568.stm 30/03/2008 Terminal 5 fiasco: The new Heathrow hassle. The independent. By Danny Fortson on 28/03/2008 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/terminal-5-fiasco-the-new-heathrow-hassle-801787.html Technology not to blame for Terminal 5 fiasco. A case study from silicon website, by Tim Ferguson. 8/05/2008 https://www.silicon.com/retailandleisure/0,3800011842,39215332,00.htm Roger Collis: How to avoid Heathrows Terminal 5. International herald tribune. Roger Collis. 17/04/2008. https://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/17/travel/trfreq18.php Lost luggage, delays, stress and tears welcome to Terminal 5. Published Date: 28 March 2008. By ANDREA VANCE https://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/Lost-luggage-delays-stress-and.3923798.jp Baggage halted at 4.3b T5. A report by the BBC on 28/03/2008 https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7317352.stm IT failure at Heathrow T5: What really happened. Posted by Michael Krigsman. 7/04/2008. https://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/?p=681 Lack of software testing to blame for Terminal 5 fiasco, BA executive tells MPs. A blog entry posted at the Computer Weekly website on the 8/05/2008. https://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2008/05/08/230602/lack-of-software-testing-to-blame-for-terminal-5-fiasco-ba-executive-tells.htm Crisis management lessons from Terminal 5. A write up by Charlie Maclean-Bristol MBCI FEPS, director, PlanB Consulting on the continuity website. 2/04/2008. https://www.continuitycentral.com/feature0566.htm Terminal disgrace: Poor training and computer failings to blame for T5 chaos as flights fiasco to last into the weekend. Blog entries on this is London website. 29/03/2008. https://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23466287-details/Terminal+disgrace:+Fights+break+out+among+queuing+passengers+as+Heathrow+opening+descends+into+chaos/article.do BA cancels 66 more flights over new terminal fiasco in Britain an editorial at yahoo business website. By Ben Perry. 29/03/2008 https://uk.biz.yahoo.com/29032008/323/ba-cancels-66-flights-new-terminal-fiasco-britain.html Heathrow Terminal 5 chaos could last all week By David Millward, Transport Editor the telegraph. 21/04/2008 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1583377/Heathrow-Terminal-5-chaos-could-last-all-week.html Terminal disgrace: Poor training and computer failings to blame for T5 chaos as flights fiasco to last into the weekend. Daily mail entry. 28/03/2008 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-547050/Terminal-disgrace-Poor-training-failings-blame-T5-chaos-flights-fiasco-weekend.html Terminal 5 baggage losses twice BA figures By David Millward, Transport Editor, the telegraph. 21/04/2008 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1583378/Terminal-5-baggage-losses-twice-BA-figures.html

Social Inequality Is Necessary For People Looking For Jobs

Social inequality is best described as an unconsciously evolved device by which societies insure that the most important positions are conscientiously filled by the most qualified person (Davis and Moore 1945: page 244). In that case, social inequality is necessary for people looking for jobs. Obviously, those who have the skills to fill a higher position will take it over someone who lacks those necessary tools. Most Americans do not like the idea that social classes exist (Domhoff 1998:page 253). What isn t so clear is why social inequality, or stratification, exists, and how you can move up in the classes. Social inequality has existed ever since jobs have been around. All positions require some form of skill or capacity for performance. Those who spend time mastering their skills, will undoubtedly get the higher occupation compared to someone with less skill in that area. This creates a lot of competition based around hard work and perseverance in getting certain jobs. Because mu ltiple people cannot fill one job slot, the most qualified gets the spot (Davis and Moore 1945: page 245). The remaining person, or people, are left to find new, more suitable jobs for the less- skilled. The harder a position is to fill, the higher the reward must be in order for it to be filled anyway (Davis and Moore 1945: page 245). If a position is easily filled, it doesn’t need to be heavily rewarded, even though it’s important (Davis and Moore 1945: page 245). This creates socialShow MoreRelatedSocial Problems Perpetuated Essays1147 Words   |  5 PagesThroughout United States history, power of the upper class has been maintained by assigning â€Å"different† people a lower, less desirable, place in society, predisposing them to social inequalities. Social stratification creates a system of social classes in which people born into a specific class have different â€Å"life chances† (Macionis 28). These classes are somewhat maintained by the fact that people tend to â€Å"take care of their own,† meaning that members of the upper class generally favor other membersRead MoreEssay on Visions of Utopia in Bellamys Looking Backward749 Words   |  3 PagesVisions of Utopia in Looking Backward  Ã‚   Edward Bellamy addressed many of the topics crucial to the development of a civilization in his book, Looking Backward. In the story he addresses several different features of years past utopias. Some being universal harmony, distribution of occupation according to individual aptitudes, equality of reward, universal ease and comfort, reduction of hours of labor, suppression of idleness, of competition, of the struggle for life, and also for money (DeRead MoreTheories That Serve As Lenses For Analyzing Society : Functionalism, Conflict Theory, And Symbolic Interactionism1433 Words   |  6 Pagesstate of social equilibrium and balance as a whole. Different social elements contribute unique aspects to society, and functionalism emphasizes how each part impacts and is impacted by other parts. For example, as technology has progressed, colleges and universities has started to offer more technical programs, and many adults have begun returning to school to learn these new abilities that are required for the evolving workplace. As more women have joined the workforce, policies on job discriminationRead MoreThe Gap Between The Rich And The Poor1575 Words   |  7 PagesIncome inequality is an issue not foreign to the American people. The gap between the rich and the poor has irrefutably increased over the past five decades and continues to grow to massive extents. It is not the presence of this imbalance that is in question, but rather whether or not this imbalance hinders the average, working American’s chance at upward mobility. This is a prevalent topic among society today because the wealth gap between the rich and the poor could essentially have detrimentalRead More Social Mobility Essay1071 Words   |  5 Pagesevery social system. Social mobility is the movement of individuals, families and groups from one social position to another. It may be studied in terms of redistribution of resources and power among the different social strata and its effect on the people involved. In the status societies the social status of the person is determined from his work. Social mobility occurs whenever people move across social class boundaries, from one amp;#8992;occupational level to another. The study of Social MobilityRead MoreSociology Is The Study Of Society And All Its Multi Facet s And Components845 Words   |  4 Pagesbecomes a social issue rather than an individual issue. It looks at the diversity in behaviour and environment around different groups of people and looks for patterns and social issues that may influence outcomes to situations. People tend to fit into social structure’s which can be defined as a class. Class is the term used to describe the varying social groupings that people belong to for different reasons but usually based on their economic earnings. Class structure highlights the social inequalityRead MoreSociologists Are Angry And You Should Be Too : Reflection On Readings Essay1747 Words   |  7 PagesSociologists are Angry and You Should Be Too: a Reflection on Readings Not enough people are upset about the social inequality in our modern American society, and there is far too much of it for people to simply ignore. Too many people are complaining about â€Å"reverse racism† and â€Å"affirmative action† and not looking at the realities of living in this country. The American systems of government and business are working against almost everyone that is not a wealthy, cisgender, heterosexual, white maleRead MoreSocioeconomic Factors and the Health of Individuals Essay1289 Words   |  6 Pagesmeasuring the standard and quality of life of individuals and families in society using social and economic factors that affect health and wellbeing ( Giddens and Sutton, 2013). Cockerham (2007 p75) argues: ‘Social class or socioeconomic status (SES) is the strongest predictor of health, disease causation and longevity in medical sociology.’ Research in the 1990s, (Drever and Whitehead, 1997) found out that people in higher SES are generally healthier, and live longer than those in lower SES. The biomedicalRead MoreThe Election Of Obama Into The Highest Political Office1728 Words   |  7 Pagesstrengthens inequalities while finding pretexts to justify its negative outcomes. Racism and capitalism are distinct concepts whose correlation is as distinct as it is complex. In essence, capitalism is the key driver of racial inequalities as evidenced in society day. Before exploring the nature of the nexus between racism and capitalism, it is necessary to look into the meanings of the terms themselves. First of all, race is premised on the notion that innate qualities distinguish people. Racial discriminationRead MoreMr. Letter : A Fair Share Of Troublemakers Essay1393 Words   |  6 Pages He knows he has gotten away with his bad behavior once again. A young girl of color, on the other hand, who also disrupts the class, goes straight to the hall when Mr. Mac asks her to leave. â€Å"In seemingly color-blind contexts, social institutions need ways to move people to their assigned places (discipline them) using rules that are racially neutral† (Hill-Collins 66). By allowing the young boy to get away with his behaviors, Mr. Mac is showing him it is okay to act in disrespectful ways and as

The Black Body, America s Captivation With The Dream

I did not like reading your novel Between the World and Me because your harsh words and overwhelming logic left me with a bitter feeling about the world. I feel that your book did an excellent job of explaining what growing up black in America is like, however, I also felt that it was overly dour. I have experienced some of the things you detailed in your book: the vulnerabilities of the black body, America’s captivation with the Dream, but even so I feel I cannot help but feel as though you’re missing several key elements. I believe that the ideas in Between the World and Me: I believe that black bodies possess an astounding amount of potential, however for some such latent potential will never be met due to the harshness of their environment and the vulnerabilities of their black body. This is a sad existence because even though Black Americans can control and nourish their bodies they do not have full possession. At any moment, their body can be taken away from them without reason. â€Å"I knew that these were theories, even in the mouths of black people, that justified the jails springing up around me, that argued for ghettos and projects, that viewed the destruction of the black body as incidental to the preservation of order† (84). Black bodies are in a sense given as a sacrifice to dream like oxygen to an inferno. The black individuals that you describe within this quote do not care about such sacrifices because they have yet realized that they too can become a sacrifice

Brine Disposal Options For Water Desalination In The Nap Region

Question: Describe about the Brine Disposal Options For Water Desalination In The Nap Region. Answer: Introduction Due to explosive increase in the population of the world with socio-economic development leads to increase in demand of water. Breunig et al. (2013) stated that the shortage of water is one of the greatest problems within the modern society.Desalination of the seawater is best way to supply of water to the population of the world, but extensive discharge of brine affects the marine biota. Barronet al. (2015) opined that desalination of the seawater is an option to raise the water quantity, which are required for the agricultural purposes in NAP region. This literature review is based on brine disposal options for desalination of water within the NAP region. Dawoudet al. (2012) cited that reserve osmosis is used in order to treat the water for the agricultural applications. It removes the salts from the seawater. The technique of reverse osmosis produces a stream of high purity water that is defined as brine. The purpose of this study is to identify the brine disposal options for wate r desalination within NAP region and respective gaps in the options. This study is conducted to prevent threats of resource sustainability and satisfy requirements to raise the production as well as delivery of potable water. Therefore, the government is focused on desalination across the region, making of enormous treatment and generates demand for worldwide knowledge with current advanced technologies. Brine disposal options for desalination of water Horticulture in the Northern Adelaide Plains (NAP) is unique in that it is the largest covered cropping region in Australia. Desalination of plant affects the environment by returning to high level of temperature concentrated brine to sea. Morilloet al. (2013) indicated that the level of vulnerability of environment to salinity changes from position to position. Another impact of the environment regulations and EPA standards are that when various products are used within chemical cleaning of membranes as well as cleaning are likely of inside the sea. The products are restricted within desalination brine, therefore probable negative impacts from disposing of brine within sea are offered if the brine is composed as well as elated to saltworks. Brine requires accurate disposal, there are many brine disposal methods, which are available, and it consists of various environmental as well as capital costs (Burnet al. 2015). The following are the brine disposal options for desalination of th e water in the NAP region. 2.1 Surface water discharge In some of the cases, the brine is being discharged to the surface water bodies like river as well as lakes. Gilronet al. (2016) stated that it is a low cost solution for the purpose of desalination of water within the NAP region. This brine disposal method is used to regulate point as well as non-point pollution sources to the surface waters. This method makes sure that the water is being treated accurately as well as residual wastes are being reused properly. This brine disposal permits to be carried out by National pollutant discharge elimination systems (NPDES). Deep-water injection well Brine is being injected into the subsurface formation of rock. It is a high cost solution as the cost for drilling as well as maintenance of well is high. This deep-water injection method is also termed as brine disposal. Bamagaet al. (2016) stated that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates this injection well. The construction of well is dependent on the injection fluid injected as well as depth of injection zone. The deep-water injection well is intended in order to inject hazards as well as carbon dioxide deep under the surface of the Earth (Sanchez, Nogueiraand Kalid 2015).This brine disposal method is to be used on geological circumstances within the region (Barronet al. 2013).The permission of this method is to be taken by underground injection control. Evaporation Pond Brine is collected within the surface impoundment that allows the brine to focus as the water is evaporated into the atmosphere. For this disposal method, there are no such federal permit is required. Prez-Gonzlezet al. (2012) opined that in some of the states, there are requirement of monitoring. From many centuries, evaporation pond is used in order to generate of salt. For the brine disposal, the evaporation of ponds are required to focus on the brine causing rainfall of crystals of salt as the solubility limit is to be attained. Morilloet al. (2013) argued that the factors those are influencing the efficiency of this method are depth of pond as well as surface area. The issues, which are related to evaporation pond, are leakage of the pond. There is leakage within the pond, then it consequences in outflow of brine contaminants into contiguous groundwater. Land application For the storage and disposal of the brine water, one of the best alternatives is use of it in the agricultural lands. In the specific regions of the country where the grass or the trees are very salt tolerant the brine water can be used to water them. Al-Karaghouli and Kazmerski(2013) stated that this disposal process is based on some certain considerations, which are, the concentration of the salt and chemical are suitable enough to avoid the contamination of the ground water and soil of that region. Metkeet al. (2016) opined that the level of the chemical and the salt are indicated by the ground water salinity and vegetation tolerance. While using the brine water for irrigation, it must be ensured that, at the time of heavy rainfall or floods some other disposal methods are available for the brine water as the flow of the rainfall along with the brine water can cause the adverse effects on the wetlands that are beneficial for habitat development. Before disposal of the brine water in the agricultural lands the site must be selected depending on certain factors, like pre application treatment of the selected land, land requirements for minerals, surface runoff rate, vegetation at the selected land and lastly the hydraulic loading rate.Sanchez, Nogueiraand Kalid(2015) cited that in addition to that, the brine water can be injected inside a natural underground structure which is isolated from the other parts geologically. This will help the disposal of the brine water inside the land without contaminating the groundwater that can be used as the drinking water and in agricultural lands. Aghdamet al.(2016) stated that as this alternative requires least annual cost, therefore it is considered as the least expensive brine water disposal method. The contaminants in the brine water helps in removing the ions, salts and heavy metals in the solution. At last the contaminants ends up as a land fill in the wetland areas. Dawoudet al. (201 2) demonstrated that this method is also considered as the environment friendly way of disposing the brine water since it does not require a huge power source for disposing the brine water. While considering this as a viable solution for the brine disposal, it is important to take note that, for disposing the brine in the lands, the area must be big enough so that, the flow of the brine should not affect the people around that area. Sewer discharge Sanchez, Nogueiraand Kalid(2015) opined that the sewage discharge of the brine water is another efficient method that utilizes the existing infrastructure of any region. Moreover, the concentration of the ions and mineral salts in the brines water also gets diluted if it is discharged in the sewage treatment plan. At the same time it is also important to keep in mind that, it can cause the growth of the bacteria in the sewage system as the brine is helpful in developing environment that helps in the growth of the bacteria. In addition to this, this will increase the load for the existing sewage treatment plan due to the included ions and metals. Even though it is a viable option for disposal of the Brine water, but before the disposal, it is important to take care of the following factors, volume and composition of the brine that is going to be discharged, possible impact of the brine on the treatment plan. As an example it is seen that, due to the excessive discharge of the Brine wa ter in the sewage system causes the precipitation of the calcium carbonate on the filters of the treatment plan. In some cases it is observed that, the discharge of the Brine solution can reduce the biological oxygen demand (BOD) in case of the waste water that is beneficial in most of the circumstances. In case of the Valley of sun, the sewage discharge is used for disposal of the brine. Dust control The use of the brine solution for controlling the dust is considered as the cost effective, legal and efficient way in different countries of the world. It is a cost effective solution for controlling the dust as it available for much lesser price compared to the road salts (Boskoet al. 2014). Brackish water or the brine water delivered from oil and gas wells and different sources, for example, brine treatment plants and wells can be utilized as a dust suppressant and street stabilizer on unpaved secondary streets. The brine in the wets the roads and binds the tiny soil particles with each other, which intern helps in reduces the formation of the dust. Only exception in this method is the brine generated from the shale formation process cannot be used as a dust suppressant on the roads. Codayet al.(2014) stated that before spreading the brine on the roads as a suppressant, it is important to ensure that, there is no water body near the road, as the brine will get flowed away with the water of rain. In this context it is also suggested that, the brine should not be spread in the rainy season or on the wet roads, as it can flow away to the water bodies near the road and contaminate it. This may affect the food chain in that region. While spreading the brine in a region the following factors must be analyzed to avoid any adverse effects. The Brine must not contain hydrogen sulphide(H2S) because it can be hazardous to human health. The best brine solution according to different researchers is the one that contains calcium and magnesium concentration more than 10000 milligram per liter (Al-Karaghouli and Kazmerski 2013).Another is chloride solution having concentration more than 75000 milligram/liter. Brine that is going to be used for dust control must be free of oil and sludge or any surface water. The application of the brine on the roads for controlling the dust must be done in a way such that, it have minimal impact on the environment. In order to have less impact on the environment it is suggested to use spreader nozzle rather than valves (Boskoet al. 2014). The brine is a waste rather than a product, therefore if applied without discrimination this disposal method also can contaminate the soil and ground water level. De-icing agent This brine disposal option is used at the months in winter in order to suppress the ice on the roads. It has power to low the freezing point of the water and then it prevents the bond between the ice as well as surface of road (Aghdamet al. 2016).It is less costly method. It is one of the alternative methods of road ice. Comparison of the brine disposal options Brine disposal option Technology used Benefits and its constraints Requirement of permits Energy Operating cost Surface water discharge Direct disposal to the surface water like lakes, rivers etc. Requires low cost of capital Requires detailed analysis to get permit from the state agency (Codayet al. 2014) Permission from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Water energy $119,000 Deep water injection well The brine is being injected into the subsurface formation of the rock (Al-Karaghouli and Kazmerski 2013). Economy of scale. Even site evaluation is also required. There is high cost of capital. Permission from Underground Injection Control Natural energy (fluid and expansion of rock) $6,00000 Evaporation pond Utilization of solar energy in order to reduce water content into brine solution It is reliable. It requires mechanical equipments to dispose the waste (Boskoet al. 2014). Some of the states are required to monitor. Thermal energy $17,3000 Land application To dilute the brine sprayed into the land It consists of backup disposal method. With the sanitary water, there is high growth of vegetarian. It requires monitoring. Renewable energy $6750000 Sewer discharge Direct disposal to the system such as sanitary sewer (Metkeet al. 2016) Cost effective method. Less permitting time to take Fee is required for the purpose of brine disposal (Anget al. 2015). Requirement of Industrial Waste Discharge Water energy $2000000 Dust control The brine disposal is required when there is a requirement for dust control. Requires small land for disposal of brine for desalination of water Some of the states are required to monitor (Ibanezet al. 2013). Mechanical energy $2000000 De-icing agent The brine is to be disposed at the month of winter. It is less costly. It requires permission by the state. Solar energy $2000000 Brine disposal technologies used in other countries The following are some of the brine disposal technologies in other countries such as: Membrane distillation:It is an osmosis driven distillation technology. This technology gives barrier to the liquid phase and it allows the vapour phase to pass throughout the pores of membrane (Doornbuschet al. 2016).It is of lower cost as well as energy use. The approximate cost of Membrane distillation is around $625. Capacitive deionization:It is a technology in order to deionizer the water by applying electrical probable difference over two absorbent carbon electrodes. This method is basically used for desalination of brackish water with low level of moderate concentration of salt. It is an energy efficient technology (Boskoet al. 2014). It removes the salt ions from the surface of water and it extracts the water from the solution of water. It is of high cost such as it costs between $3000 and 4000. Wind Aided Intensified Evaporation:Due to increase in the shortage of water, there is brackish water, and this method is used for brine disposal of the desalination of water (Aghdamet al. 2016). Its limitations are cost as well as technical feasibility for the purpose of concentrate disposal. Its cost of capital is approximately 5.5 percent. Conclusion It is concluded that the most of the brine disposal methods mentioned are used in Australia for desalination of water. The methods used are surface water discharge, deep well injection well, evaporation pond, sewer discharge as well as land application. In the future, the brine disposal plants should adopt of new technology for brine disposal. The mentioned disposal methods are used to increase brine volume. It resulted into increase in irrigation demand of water within NAP region. References Aghdam, M.A., Zraick, F., Simon, J., Farrell, J. and Snyder, S.A., 2016. A novel brine precipitation process for higher water recovery.Desalination,385, pp.69-74. Al-Karaghouli, A. and Kazmerski, L.L., 2013. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,24, pp.343-356. Ang, W.L., Mohammad, A.W., Hilal, N. and Leo, C.P., 2015. A review on the applicability of integrated/hybrid membrane processes in water treatment and desalination plants.Desalination,363, pp.2-18. Bamaga, O.A., Al-Sharif, S.F., Balkhair, K.S., Gzara, L. and Albeirutty, M., 2016. Improvement of urban water cycle and mitigation of groundwater table rise through advanced membrane desalination of shallow urban brackish groundwater of Jeddah basin.Desalination and Water Treatment,57(1), pp.124-135. Barron, O., Ali, R., Hodgson, G., Smith, D., Qureshi, E., McFarlane, D., Campos, E. and Zarzo, D., 2015. Feasibility assessment of desalination application in Australian traditional agriculture.Desalination,364, pp.33-45. Barron, O.V., Ali, R., Hodgson, G., Smith, D., Qureshi, M.E., McFarlane, D., Burn, S., Kumar, A., Campos, E., Olewniak, F. and Zarzo, D., 2013.National and regional assessment of opportunities for desalination in Australian agriculture. Technical Report to National Centre of Excellence in Desalination in Australia, CSIRO Flagship Water for a Healthy Country, Australia. Bosko, M.L., Rodrigues, M.A.S., Ferreira, J.Z., Mir, E.E. and Bernardes, A.M., 2014. Nitrate reduction of brines from water desalination plants by membrane electrolysis.Journal of Membrane Science,451, pp.276-284. Breunig, H.M., Birkholzer, J.T., Borgia, A., Oldenburg, C.M., Price, P.N. and McKone, T.E., 2013. Regional evaluation of brine management for geologic carbon sequestration.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,14, pp.39-48. Burn, S., Hoang, M., Zarzo, D., Olewniak, F., Campos, E., Bolto, B. and Barron, O., 2015. Desalination techniquesa review of the opportunities for desalination in agriculture.Desalination,364, pp.2-16. Coday, B.D., Xu, P., Beaudry, E.G., Herron, J., Lampi, K., Hancock, N.T. and Cath, T.Y., 2014. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams.Desalination,333(1), pp.23-35. Dawoud, M.A., 2012. Environmental impacts of seawater desalination: Arabian Gulf case study.International Journal of Environment and Sustainability (IJES),1(3). Doornbusch, G.J., Dykstra, J.E., Biesheuvel, P.M. and Suss, M.E., 2016. Fluidized bed electrodes with high carbon loading for water desalination by capacitive deionization.Journal of Materials Chemistry A,4(10), pp.3642-3647. Gilron, J., 2016. Brine Treatment and High Recovery Desalination.Emerging Membrane Technology for Sustainable Water Treatment, p.297. Ibanez, R., Perez-Gonzlez, A., Gomez, P., Urtiaga, A.M. and Ortiz, I., 2013. Acid and base recovery from softened reverse osmosis (RO) brines. Experimental assessment using model concentrates.Desalination,309, pp.165-170. Metke, T., Westover, A.S., Carter, R., Oakes, L., Douglas, A. and Pint, C.L., 2016. Particulate-free porous silicon networks for efficient capacitive deionization water desalination.Scientific reports,6. Morillo, J., Usero, J., Rosado, D., El Bakouri, H., Riaza, A. and Bernaola, F.J., 2014. Comparative study of brine management technologies for desalination plants.Desalination,336, pp.32-49. Perez-Gonzlez, A., Urtiaga, A.M., Ibez, R. and Ortiz, I., 2012. State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates.Water research,46(2), pp.267-283. Sanchez, A.S., Nogueira, I.B.R. and Kalid, R.A., 2015. Uses of the reject brine from inland desalination for fish farming, Spirulina cultivation, and irrigation of forage shrub and crops.Desalination,364, pp.96-107.